India and Pakistan matches have always been more than just cricket—they are presented like a battlefield. Historically, this rivalry carried not only political and emotional weight but also pure cricketing thrill. Yet, yesterday’s Asia Cup clash felt one-sided, as if an international team was playing against a club side. India demolished Pakistan, and fans celebrated with pride. But what followed raised an important question—was it true sportsmanship? After the emphatic win, several Indian players including Suryakumar Yadav and Shivam Dube skipped the handshake with Pakistani players, heading straight to the dressing room. Later, they justified the move citing the recent Pahalgam terror attack. But does mixing cricket with politics diminish the spirit of the game? Even in war, there are rules and respect for the fallen—why should the cricket field be any different? The debate goes deeper: Should India have played the match at all? Was it just BCCI’s decision as a private body, or was it forced due to ICC’s multinational tournament rules? Politicians, journalists, and former cricketers are all divided. While some defend the boycott of gestures, others like Shoaib Akhtar stress on keeping politics away from sports. This video breaks down the controversy, the politics behind Indo-Pak cricket, the TRP game, and the larger question—what is the purpose of sports if sportsmanship is missing?